| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The hickory-resolver component of Hickory DNS 0.25.0 before 0.26.2 follows irrelevant CNAME records when resolving recursive queries, sending queries that are unnecessary to answer the original request. Attackers controlling DNS responses can include CNAME records in the authority or additional sections, or outside the original query name's CNAME chain, causing excess resolver queries and increased query amplification. |
| The DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) server in hickory-server (hickory-dns) before 0.26.2 does not apply any timeout when reading a request message from a QUIC stream, bypassing all configured timeouts. A remote unauthenticated client can open a connection and a request stream and hold it open indefinitely, consuming server resources and causing a denial of service. |
| Hickory DNS from 0.24.0 before 0.26.2 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability that allows remote attackers to consume server memory via unbounded DoH request bodies. Attackers can send large request bodies over HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 to a DNS over HTTP server, causing memory exhaustion and denial of service. |
| Hickory DNS hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 and hickory-proto 0.24.0 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 compare DNSKEY public keys against DNSSEC trust anchors without checking the DNSKEY record name, so an RRset made up only of trusted keys is accepted without RRSIG verification. Attackers able to spoof or control name server responses can replace a secure zone's DNSKEY RRset with the root zone's keys, and use a large TTL to keep it cached. |
| Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25.0 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 invert the relational operators in the wrap-around branch of find_covering_record() in nsec3.rs, so the last NSEC3 record in a zone's hash ring covers every hash except its owner. Attackers able to inject DNS responses can replay that NSEC3 record and its RRSIG to forge DNSSEC-validated negative responses denying legitimate names. |
| hickory-dns from 0.20.1 before 0.26.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the hickory-proto SVCB and HTTPS record presentation format parser. Attackers can supply untrusted zone files where only a single or double quote replaces a service parameter value, triggering a panic that crashes the parsing process. |
| OpenAM before 16.1.4 ships built-in identities in the Top Level Realm (demo, anonymous, wsc, wsp, SecurityTokenService and agentAuth) with passwords that are identical on every installation, publicly known, and able to authenticate. Unauthenticated remote attackers can log in as these identities to obtain authenticated sessions, and the agent identities can read the configuration of other agent profiles. |
| OpenAM before 16.1.4 contains an open redirect vulnerability that allows remote attackers to redirect users after SAML 1.x single sign-on by exploiting loose trusted-partner destination matching. Attackers can craft links to /SAMLAwareServlet or /SAMLPOSTProfileServlet with a destination host resembling a trusted partner to send authenticated users to attacker-controlled phishing sites. |
| OpenAM from 14.5.1 before 16.1.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the OAuth 2.0 device authorization flow that allows attackers to approve device codes when consent is skipped for implied-consent clients. Attackers can start a device authorization and lure a logged-in user to a crafted page, obtaining access and ID tokens to call APIs as that user. |
| OpenAM before 16.1.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows parties registering UMA resource sets to trigger internal requests through unvalidated scope description URLs. Attackers can register resource sets with scope URLs pointing to internal hosts or cloud metadata endpoints, which OpenAM fetches when sending pending-request notification emails, enabling internal network probing. |
| Improper Access Control Applied to Mirrored or Aliased Memory Regions in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to change the encryption bit for guest context pages potentially resulting in loss of integrity. |
| SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal does not sufficiently protect certain server-side actions against cross-site request forgery. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link that, when clicked by an authenticated user, triggers an unintended action on the server. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to modify non-sensitive information, resulting in a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality and availability. |
| SAP Host Agent does not sufficiently validate certain inputs. Under certain condition, an attacker with low privileges could abuse the affected functionality to influence an internal component into loading a malicious file under a privileged account. Successful exploitation could lead to persistent code execution, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability. |
| SAP HANA XSA Web Dispatcher does not perform sufficient request validation in certain administrative functionality. In the context of SAP HANA XSA Web Dispatcher, an unauthenticated attacker could trick a logged-on administrator into visiting a malicious link. Visiting the link could cause unintended actions in the administrator's session. Successful exploitation could lead to a temporary compromise of the SAP HANA XSA Web Dispatcher, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality, and partial impact on integrity, and availability. |
| SAP NetWeaver Application Server (SAP Message Server) does not properly size memory allocations when handling certain HTTP requests. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request to trigger a heap buffer overflow in affected functionality. Successful exploitation causes the component to abort and remain unavailable until it is restarted by the framework, resulting in a high impact on availability of the system. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application. |
| Due to a missing authorization check in certain remote-enabled functionality, SAP Solution Tools Plug-In allows an authenticated attacker to invoke this functionality to access data that would otherwise be restricted. Exploitation is only possible under certain conditions, as the attacker must have prior knowledge of specific internal identifiers to successfully target the affected functionality. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read sensitive information, resulting in a low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability. |
| SAP NetWeaver (Internet Graphics Service) does not sufficiently validate certain input values within incoming requests. An unauthenticated user could send a specially crafted request causing the affected process to read beyond the declared values, resulting in repeated termination of the worker process. This results in a high impact on availability with no impact on integrity or confidentiality. |
| SAP Web Dispatcher does not sufficiently validate certain inputs during processing, which could lead to memory corruption. An attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user could exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted input, causing the Web Dispatcher process to terminate without user interaction. As a result, the Web Dispatcher and all backend systems reachable through it become unavailable, leading to a high impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality or integrity of the application. |
| Due to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver AS Java (Web Services), an unauthenticated attacker could craft a SOAP request that causes the server to return a SOAP fault to a URL under the attacker�s control. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to disclose information about connected systems, impacting confidentiality, while integrity and availability remain unaffected. |
| SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java (Web Dynpro Java) does not sufficiently validate certain request parameters used to resolve styling resources in the application. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link that, when clicked by an authenticated victim, causes the victim's browser to load attacker-controlled styling content within the trusted application context. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to redress the trusted user interface for phishing purposes and exfiltrate limited web page content, resulting in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability. |
