| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Issuetracker phpBugTracker before 1.7.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that cause an unspecified impact via unknown parameters. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Issuetracker phpBugTracker before 1.7.0 allow remote authenticated users to (1) hijack the authentication of users for requests that cause an unspecified impact via the id parameter to project.php, (2) hijack the authentication of users for requests that cause an unspecified impact via the group_id parameter to group.php, (3) hijack the authentication of users for requests that delete statuses via the status_id parameter to status.php, (4) hijack the authentication of users for requests that delete severities via the severity_id parameter to severity.php, (5) hijack the authentication of users for requests that cause an unspecified impact via the priority_id parameter to priority.php, (6) hijack the authentication of users for requests that delete the operating system via the os_id parameter to os.php, (7) hijack the authentication of users for requests that delete databases via the database_id parameter to database.php, or (8) hijack the authentication of users for requests that delete sites via the site_id parameter to sites.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SOGo before 3.1.0. |
| In Hitachi Vantara Pentaho BA Platform through 8.0, a CSRF issue exists in the Business Analytics application. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin terminal in Hawt.io allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that run commands on the Karaf server, as demonstrated by running "shutdown -f." |
| The Lenovo Service Framework Android application uses a set of nonsecure credentials when performing integrity verification of downloaded applications and/or data. This exposes the application to man-in-the-middle attacks leading to possible remote code execution. |
| A vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against an administrative user. More Information: CSCuz03317. Known Affected Releases: 2.6. Known Fixed Releases: 2.7.1.12. |
| An issue was discovered in Carlo Gavazzi VMU-C EM prior to firmware Version A11_U05, and VMU-C PV prior to firmware Version A17. Successful exploitation of this CROSS-SITE REQUEST FORGERY (CSRF) vulnerability can allow execution of unauthorized actions on the device such as configuration parameter changes, and saving modified configuration. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in Schneider Electric Wonderware InTouch Access Anywhere, version 11.5.2 and prior. The client request may be forged from a different site. This will allow an external site to access internal RDP systems on behalf of the currently logged in user. |
| An issue was discovered in BINOM3 Universal Multifunctional Electric Power Quality Meter. There is no CSRF Token generated per page and/or per (sensitive) function. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can allow silent execution of unauthorized actions on the device such as configuration parameter changes, and saving modified configuration. |
| An issue was discovered in Hanwha Techwin Smart Security Manager Versions 1.5 and prior. Multiple Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities have been identified. The flaws exist within the Redis and Apache Felix Gogo servers that are installed as part of this product. By issuing specific HTTP Post requests, an attacker can gain system level access to a remote shell session. Smart Security Manager Versions 1.5 and prior are affected by these vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities can allow for remote code execution. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) vulnerability in Directory Server (aka Enterprise Server Administration web UI) in Micro Focus Enterprise Developer and Enterprise Server 2.3 and earlier, 2.3 Update 1 before Hotfix 8, and 2.3 Update 2 before Hotfix 9 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to view and alter (CWE-275) configuration information and inject OS commands (CWE-78) via forged requests. |
| Routes used to stop running Metasploit tasks (either particular ones or all tasks) allowed GET requests. Only POST requests should have been allowed, as the stop/stop_all routes change the state of the service. This could have allowed an attacker to stop currently-running Metasploit tasks by getting an authenticated user to execute JavaScript. As of Metasploit 4.14.0 (Update 2017061301), the routes for stopping tasks only allow POST requests, which validate the presence of a secret token to prevent CSRF attacks. |
| Versions 4.3.2-R4 and prior of Cambium Networks cnPilot firmware lack CSRF controls that can mitigate the effects of CSRF attacks, which are most typically implemented as randomized per-session tokens associated with any web application function, especially destructive ones. |
| Versions of Nexpose prior to 6.4.66 fail to adequately validate the source of HTTP requests intended for the Automated Actions administrative web application, and are susceptible to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. |
| ZoneMinder v1.30 and v1.29, an open-source CCTV server web application, is vulnerable to CSRF (Cross Site Request Forgery) which allows a remote attack to make changes to the web application as the current logged in victim. If the victim visits a malicious web page, the attacker can silently and automatically create a new admin user within the web application for remote persistence and further attacks. The URL is /zm/index.php and sample parameters could include action=user uid=0 newUser[Username]=attacker1 newUser[Password]=Password1234 conf_password=Password1234 newUser[System]=Edit (among others). |
| comment.php in Serendipity through 2.0.5 allows CSRF in deleting any comments. |
| Serendipity through 2.0.5 allows CSRF for the installation of an event plugin or a sidebar plugin. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ntopng through 2.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, as demonstrated by admin/add_user.lua, admin/change_user_prefs.lua, admin/delete_user.lua, and admin/password_reset.lua. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress before 4.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors involving a Flash file upload. |
