Export limit exceeded: 15496 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (15496 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-8974 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 8.8 High |
| Memory safety bugs present in Thunderbird 140.10 and Thunderbird 150. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 151, Firefox ESR 140.11, Thunderbird 151, and Thunderbird 140.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8973 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 8.8 High |
| Memory safety bugs present in Thunderbird 150. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 151 and Thunderbird 151. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8975 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 8.8 High |
| Memory safety bugs present in Thunderbird 140.10 and Thunderbird 150. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 151, Firefox ESR 115.36, Firefox ESR 140.11, Thunderbird 151, and Thunderbird 140.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16411 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2026-10-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Memory safety bugs present in Thunderbird 152. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 153 and Thunderbird 153. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8093 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 8.1 High |
| Memory safety bugs present in Thunderbird 150.0.1. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 150.0.2 and Thunderbird 150.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12317 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 7.5 High |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152 and Thunderbird 152. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12314 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 7.5 High |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152, Firefox ESR 140.12, Thunderbird 152, and Thunderbird 140.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12312 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 7.5 High |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152, Firefox ESR 140.12, Thunderbird 152, and Thunderbird 140.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12310 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 7.5 High |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152, Firefox ESR 140.12, Thunderbird 152, and Thunderbird 140.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12309 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152, Firefox ESR 140.12, Thunderbird 152, and Thunderbird 140.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12308 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152, Firefox ESR 140.12, Thunderbird 152, and Thunderbird 140.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12307 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152, Firefox ESR 140.12, Thunderbird 152, and Thunderbird 140.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12306 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152, Firefox ESR 140.12, Thunderbird 152, and Thunderbird 140.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12305 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 7.5 High |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152, Firefox ESR 140.12, Thunderbird 152, and Thunderbird 140.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12301 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152 and Thunderbird 152. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12300 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152 and Thunderbird 152. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12290 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 8.1 High |
| Memory safety bug fixed in Thunderbird 152. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152, Firefox ESR 140.12, Firefox ESR 115.37, Thunderbird 152, and Thunderbird 140.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16360 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-10-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Memory safety bugs present in Thunderbird ESR 140.12 and Thunderbird 152. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 153, Firefox ESR 115.38, Firefox ESR 140.13, Thunderbird 153, and Thunderbird 140.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16412 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2026-10-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Memory safety bugs present in Thunderbird ESR 140.12 and Thunderbird 152. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 153, Firefox ESR 140.13, Thunderbird 153, and Thunderbird 140.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98085 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-21 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: backtrack_insn(): Handle ld_{abs,ind} subprog exit edge Nicholas Carlini reported a bug in precision backtracking mechanism for BPF_LD | BPF_{IND,ABS} instructions. These instructions are modelled as two branches: - fallthrough; - implicit exit from current subprogram. The implicit exit case was not handled by the backtrack_insn() function. When backtracking such a path backtrack_insn() did not call bt_subprog_enter(), which meant that backtracking continued manipulating precision marks in a caller frame, while looking at instructions in a callee frame. This lead to segmentation faults during verification (see the selftest), or unsound state pruning. | ||||