Export limit exceeded: 16390 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16390 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-3299 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Out-Of-Bounds Write, Use of Uninitialized Resource and Use-After-Free vulnerabilities exist in the file reading procedure in eDrawings from Release SOLIDWORKS 2023 through Release SOLIDWORKS 2024. These vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code while opening a specially crafted SLDDRW or SLDPRT file. NOTE: this vulnerability was SPLIT from CVE-2024-1847. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33008 | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| SAP Replication Server allows an attacker to use gateway for executing some commands to RSSD. This could result in crashing the Replication Server due to memory corruption with high impact on Availability of the system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7139 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Due to an unchecked buffer length, a specially crafted L2CAP packet can cause a buffer overflow. This buffer overflow triggers an assert, which results in a temporary denial of service. If a watchdog timer is not enabled, a hard reset is required to recover the device. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5405 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Experion Server | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| Server information leak for the CDA Server process memory can occur when an error is generated in response to a specially crafted message. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5406 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| Server communication with a controller can lead to remote code execution using a specially crafted message from the controller. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7137 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| The L2CAP receive data buffer for L2CAP packets is restricted to packet sizes smaller than the maximum supported packet size. Receiving a packet that exceeds the restricted buffer length may cause a crash. A hard reset is required to recover the crashed device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30015 | 2026-04-15 | 4.1 Medium | ||
| Due to incorrect memory address handling in ABAP SQL of SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP), an authenticated attacker with high privileges could execute certain forms of SQL queries leading to manipulation of content in the output variable. This vulnerability has a low impact on the confidentiality, integrity and the availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36964 | 1 Ik80 | 1 Yatinywinftp | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| YATinyWinFTP contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to crash the FTP service by sending a 272-byte buffer with a trailing space. Attackers can exploit the service by connecting and sending a malformed command that triggers a buffer overflow and service crash. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37031 | 1 Ashkon | 1 Simple Startup Manager | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| Simple Startup Manager 1.17 contains a local buffer overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by overwriting memory through the 'File' input parameter. Attackers can craft a malicious payload with 268 bytes to trigger code execution, bypassing DEP and overwriting memory addresses to launch calc.exe. | ||||
| CVE-2021-46772 | 2026-04-15 | 3.9 Low | ||
| Insufficient input validation in the ABL may allow a privileged attacker with access to the BIOS menu or UEFI shell to tamper with the structure headers in SPI ROM causing an out of bounds memory read and write, potentially resulting in memory corruption or denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2020-26312 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Dotmesh is a git-like command-line interface for capturing, organizing and sharing application states. In versions 0.8.1 and prior, the unsafe handling of symbolic links in an unpacking routine may enable attackers to read and/or write to arbitrary locations outside the designated target folder. The routine `untarFile` attempts to guard against creating symbolic links that point outside the directory a tar archive is extracted to. However, a malicious tarball first linking `subdir/parent` to `..` (allowed, because `subdir/..` falls within the archive root) and then linking `subdir/parent/escapes` to `..` results in a symbolic link pointing to the tarball’s parent directory, contrary to the routine’s goals. This issue may lead to arbitrary file write (with same permissions as the program running the unpack operation) if the attacker can control the archive file. Additionally, if the attacker has read access to the unpacked files, they may be able to read arbitrary system files the parent process has permissions to read. As of time of publication, no patch for this issue is available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12248 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Contec Health CMS8000 Patient Monitor is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds write, which could allow an attacker to send specially formatted UDP requests in order to write arbitrary data. This could result in remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26403 | 1 Intel | 2 Xeon, Xeon Processors | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| Out-of-bounds write in the memory subsystem for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processors when using Intel(R) SGX or Intel(R) TDX may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54957 | 1 Dolby | 1 Udc | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Dolby UDC 4.5 through 4.13. A crash of the DD+ decoder process can occur when a malformed DD+ bitstream is processed. When Evolution data is processed by evo_priv.c from the DD+ bitstream, the decoder writes that data into a buffer. The length calculation for a write can overflow due to an integer wraparound. This can lead to the allocated buffer being too small, and the out-of-bounds check of the subsequent write to be ineffective, leading to an out-of-bounds write. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7695 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Multiple switches are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability. This vulnerability is caused by insufficient input validation, which allows data to be written to memory outside the bounds of the buffer. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in a denial-of-service attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32639 | 1 Siemens | 1 Tecnomatix Plant Simulation | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2302 (All versions < V2302.0011). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing a specially crafted MODEL file. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-22974) | ||||
| CVE-2025-0010 | 1 Amd | 10 Athlon, Graphics Driver, Instinct Mi200 and 7 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| An out of bounds write in the Linux graphics driver could allow an attacker to overflow the buffer potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0034 | 1 Amd | 2 Instinct Mi300x, Instinct Mi325x | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium |
| Insufficient parameter sanitization in TEE SOC Driver could allow an attacker to issue a malformed DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_SPATIAL_PART and cause read or write past the end of allocated arrays, potentially resulting in a loss of platform integrity or denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10451 | 1 Insyde | 1 Insydeh2o | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| Unchecked output buffer may allowed arbitrary code execution in SMM and potentially result in SMM memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32008 | 1 Intel | 1 Intel Amt And Intel Standard Manageability | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| Out-of-bounds write in the firmware for the Intel(R) AMT and Intel(R) Standard Manageability within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Network adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (low) impacts. | ||||