Export limit exceeded: 11091 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11065 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11065 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-42476 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| In the OAuth library for nim prior to version 0.11, the Authorization Code grant and Implicit grant both rely on the `state` parameter to prevent cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks where a resource owner might have their session associated with protected resources belonging to an attacker. When this project is compiled with certain compiler flags set, it is possible that the `state` parameter will not be checked at all, creating a CSRF vulnerability. Version 0.11 checks the `state` parameter using a regular `if` statement or `doAssert` instead of relying on a plain `assert`. `doAssert` will achieve the desired behavior even if `-d:danger` or `--assertions:off` is set. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4616 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Prisma Browser | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An insufficient validation of an untrusted input vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Browser allows a locally authenticated non-admin user to revert the browser’s security controls. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42504 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A security vulnerability in HPE IceWall Agent products could be exploited remotely to cause a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the login flow. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25056 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Wi-Fi AP UNIT 'AC-WPS-11ac series'. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25042 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in the AOS-CX REST interface could allow an authenticated remote attacker with low privileges to view sensitive information. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to read encrypted credentials of other users on the switch, potentially leading to further unauthorized access or data breaches. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69634 | 1 Dolibarr | 1 Dolibarr | 2026-04-15 | 9 Critical |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Dolibarr ERP & CRM v.22.0.9 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the notes field in perms.php NOTE: this is disputed by a third party who indicates that exploitation can only occur if an unprivileged user knows the token of an admin user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-44113 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Due to missing authorization checks, SAP Business Warehouse (BEx Analyzer) allows an authenticated attacker to access information over the network which is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation the attacker can enumerate information causing a limited impact on confidentiality of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45248 | 1 Multi-dnc | 1 Multi-dnc | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Multi-DNC – CWE-35: Path Traversal: '.../...//' | ||||
| CVE-2024-47100 | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1BE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/DC (6ES7211-1AE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1HE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1BE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1BG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1BG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1217C DC/DC/DC (6ES7217-1AG40-0XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2212-1AE40-1XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2214-1AG40-1XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AF40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HF40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AF40-5XB0). The web interface of the affected devices is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to change the CPU mode by tricking a legitimate and authenticated user with sufficient permissions on the target CPU to click on a malicious link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47211 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openstack | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| In OpenStack Ironic before 21.4.4, 22.x and 23.x before 23.0.3, 23.x and 24.x before 24.1.3, and 25.x and 26.x before 26.1.0, there is a lack of checksum validation of supplied image_source URLs when configured to convert images to a raw format for streaming. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20060 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An attacker could expose cross-user personal identifiable information (PII) and personal health information transmitted to the Android device via the Dario Health application database. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48930 | 1 Secp256k1-node Project | 1 Secp256k1-node | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| secp256k1-node is a Node.js binding for an Optimized C library for EC operations on curve secp256k1. In `elliptic`-based version, `loadUncompressedPublicKey` has a check that the public key is on the curve. Prior to versions 5.0.1, 4.0.4, and 3.8.1, however, `loadCompressedPublicKey` is missing that check. That allows the attacker to use public keys on low-cardinality curves to extract enough information to fully restore the private key from as little as 11 ECDH sessions, and very cheaply on compute power. Other operations on public keys are also affected, including e.g. `publicKeyVerify()` incorrectly returning `true` on those invalid keys, and e.g. `publicKeyTweakMul()` also returning predictable outcomes allowing to restore the tweak. Versions 5.0.1, 4.0.4, and 3.8.1 contain a fix for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15550 | 1 Birkir | 1 Prime | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| birkir prime <= 0.4.0.beta.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its GraphQL endpoint that allows attackers to exploit GET-based query requests. Attackers can craft malicious GET requests to trigger unauthorized actions against privileged users by manipulating GraphQL query parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48099 | 2 Codeamp, Wordpress | 2 Search & Filter, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Code Amp Search & Filter search-filter allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Search & Filter: from n/a through <= 1.2.17. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48111 | 2 Wordpress, Yithemes | 2 Wordpress, Yith Paypal Express Checkout For Woocommerce | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in YITHEMES YITH PayPal Express Checkout for WooCommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects YITH PayPal Express Checkout for WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.49.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14317 | 1 Emaintenance | 1 Crazy Bubble Tea | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In Crazy Bubble Tea mobile application authenticated attacker can obtain personal information about other users by enumerating a `loyaltyGuestId` parameter. Server does not verify the permissions required to obtain the data. This issue was fixed in version 915 (Android) and 7.4.1 (iOS). | ||||
| CVE-2025-13970 | 1 Openplcproject | 1 Openplc V3 | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| OpenPLC_V3 is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack due to the absence of proper CSRF validation. This issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a maliciously crafted link, potentially enabling unauthorized modification of PLC settings or the upload of malicious programs which could lead to significant disruption or damage to connected systems. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1358 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Pix Software Vivaz 6.0.10. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3238 | 1 Looks Awesome | 1 Superfly Responsive Menu | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The WordPress Menu Plugin — Superfly Responsive Menu plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.29. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_handle_delete_icons() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Please not the CSRF was patched in 5.0.28, however, adequate directory traversal protection wasn't introduced until 5.0.30. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13008 | 2 M-files, M-files Corporation | 3 M-files Server, Server, M-files Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in M-Files Server before versions 25.12.15491.7, 25.8 LTS SR3, 25.2 LTS SR3 and 24.8 LTS SR5 allows an authenticated attacker using M-Files Web to capture session tokens of other active users. | ||||