Export limit exceeded: 18157 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (18157 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-28665 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 8.4 High |
| In onCreate of SettingsApplication.java, there is a possible cross-profile consent dialog label injection due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0047 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 8.4 High |
| In dumpBitmapsProto of ActivityManagerService.java, there is a possible way for an app to access private information due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58865 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| In multiple functions of PduParser.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58854 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58835 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 8.8 High |
| In cfg2prop of btif_storage.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58815 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55270 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In dialInternal in multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28581 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 4 Medium |
| In fixInitiatingUserIfNecessary of CallIntentProcessor.java, there is a possible way to make an emergency call due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28578 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 5.5 Medium |
| In multiple functions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync from persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0100 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In Load of LoadedArsc.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0098 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In getCallingPackageName of Shared.java, there is a possible way to bypass activity start restrictions due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0096 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In getAppLabel of ForgetDeviceDialogFragment.java, there is a possible trick the user into forgetting a device due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0094 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In getApplicationLabel of KeyChainActivity.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving access to certificates due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0091 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to execute code in the launcher process due to an over-privileged shell user. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0088 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In getCallingAppLabel of CertInstaller.java, there is a possible way to hide a sensitive security dialogue due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0086 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 6.8 Medium |
| In onCreate of DisableSupervisionActivity.kt, there is a possible way to delete supervision data due to a missing null check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0080 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible way to cause a crash due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0078 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In setGlobalProxy of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0076 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In validateNode of ResourceTypes.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0074 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-06 | 5.5 Medium |
| In getPreferredSize of LauncherProcessImageListener.kt, there is a possible denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||