Export limit exceeded: 14426 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11475 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 422349 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 14426 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11072 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11072 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-7904 | 1 Cmsmadesimple | 1 Cms Made Simple | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CMS Made Simple before 2.1.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create accounts via an admin/adduser.php request. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7980 | 1 Spip | 1 Spip | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ecrire/exec/valider_xml.php in SPIP 3.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute the XML validator on a local file via a crafted valider_xml request. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-7998 to execute arbitrary PHP code. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8018 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Virusscan Enterprise | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Intel Security VirusScan Enterprise Linux (VSEL) 2.0.3 (and earlier) allows authenticated remote attackers to execute unauthorized commands via a crafted user input. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9218 | 1 Cisco | 1 Hybrid Meeting Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Hybrid Meeting Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against the user of the web interface. More Information: CSCvc28662. Known Affected Releases: 1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9455 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). A number of scripts in Revive Adserver's user interface are vulnerable to CSRF attacks: `www/admin/banner-acl.php`, `www/admin/banner-activate.php`, `www/admin/banner-advanced.php`, `www/admin/banner-modify.php`, `www/admin/banner-swf.php`, `www/admin/banner-zone.php`, `www/admin/tracker-modify.php`. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9456 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The Revive Adserver team conducted a security audit of the admin interface scripts in order to identify and fix other potential CSRF vulnerabilities. Over 20+ such issues were fixed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0902 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| RubyGems version 2.6.12 and earlier is vulnerable to a DNS hijacking vulnerability that allows a MITM attacker to force the RubyGems client to download and install gems from a server that the attacker controls. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000008 | 1 Chyrp-lite Project | 1 Chyrp Lite | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Chyrp Lite version 2016.04 is vulnerable to a CSRF in the user settings function allowing attackers to hijack the authentication of logged in users to modify account information, including their password. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000069 | 1 Oauth2 Proxy Project | 1 Oauth2 Proxy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF in Bitly oauth2_proxy 2.1 during authentication flow | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000085 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Subversion, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Subversion Plugin connects to a user-specified Subversion repository as part of form validation (e.g. to retrieve a list of tags). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Item/Build permission (but not Item/Configure) to connect to any web server or Subversion server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000090 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Role-based Authorization Strategy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Role-based Authorization Strategy Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to add administrator role to any user, or to remove the authorization configuration, preventing legitimate access to Jenkins. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000091 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Github Branch Source | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| GitHub Branch Source Plugin connects to a user-specified GitHub API URL (e.g. GitHub Enterprise) as part of form validation and completion (e.g. to verify Scan Credentials are correct). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Overall/Read access to Jenkins to connect to any web server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000092 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Git, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Git Plugin connects to a user-specified Git repository as part of form validation. An attacker with no direct access to Jenkins but able to guess at a username/password credentials ID could trick a developer with job configuration permissions into following a link with a maliciously crafted Jenkins URL which would result in the Jenkins Git client sending the username and password to an attacker-controlled server. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000093 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Poll Scm | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Poll SCM Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to initiate polling of projects with a known name. While Jenkins in general does not consider polling to be a protection-worthy action as it's similar to cache invalidation, the plugin specifically adds a permission to be able to use this functionality, and this issue undermines that permission. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000147 | 1 Mahara | 1 Mahara | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Mahara 1.9 before 1.9.8 and 1.10 before 1.10.6 and 15.04 before 15.04.3 are vulnerable to perform a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on the uploader contained in Mahara's filebrowser widget. This could allow an attacker to trick a Mahara user into unknowingly uploading malicious files into their Mahara account. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10680 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piwigo through 2.9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to change a private album to public via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10681 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piwigo through 2.9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to unlock albums via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10677 | 1 Linksys | 2 Ea4500, Ea4500 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists on Linksys EA4500 devices with Firmware Version before 2.1.41.164606, as demonstrated by a request to apply.cgi to disable SIP. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30617 | 1 Chamilo | 1 Chamilo Lms | 2025-04-18 | 5.4 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chamilo LMS 1.11.26 "/main/social/home.php," allows attackers to initiate a request that posts a fake post onto the user's social wall without their consent or knowledge. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3756 | 1 Mf Gig Calendar Project | 1 Mf Gig Calendar | 2025-04-18 | 7.5 High |
| The MF Gig Calendar WordPress plugin through 1.2.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in Contributors and above delete arbitrary events via a CSRF attack | ||||