Export limit exceeded: 18085 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11798 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 16526 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16526 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-33379 | 1 Grafana | 2 Grafana, Grafana Enterprise | 2026-11-06 | 8.5 High |
| A user with any role, including Viewer or a service account with no permissions, can create, externally publish, and delete dashboard snapshots (missing authorization). Only Grafana OSS and Grafana Enterprise 12.4 are affected; earlier versions and Grafana 13 are not. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119259 | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The All-in-One Video Gallery WordPress plugin before 5.1.0 does not check the type, status or ownership of the target post before writing its view count and duration meta, allowing unauthenticated visitors to create or change that meta on any post, including private and draft posts, and to inflate the view count without limit. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118186 | 2026-11-06 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| The PublishPress Revisions: Duplicate Posts, Submit, Approve and Schedule Content Changes WordPress plugin before 4.3.1 does not correctly restrict who may publish content, allowing users such as Contributors who can edit but not publish to make unreviewed posts and pages publicly live, bypassing the intended editorial approval workflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-123327 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19562 missing authorization in the saved query endpoint allowed disclosure of issue descriptions | ||||
| CVE-2026-123333 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-11-06 | 3.8 Low |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19562 sprint creation allowed moving issues from inaccessible projects between sprints | ||||
| CVE-2026-123324 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-11-06 | 7.7 High |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19562 information disclosure via shared mailbox message history was possible | ||||
| CVE-2026-123328 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-11-06 | 6.4 Medium |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19656 app permission bypass allowed privilege escalation via project tab | ||||
| CVE-2026-123332 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-11-06 | 4.7 Medium |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19562 missing authorization allowed Project Admin to manage VCS hosting server configurations | ||||
| CVE-2026-123279 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Datalore | 2026-11-06 | 9 Critical |
| In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 code execution was possible in a notebook's computation by view-only collaborators | ||||
| CVE-2026-123280 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Datalore | 2026-11-06 | 8.1 High |
| In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.2.4 unauthenticated users could execute code via published interactive reports | ||||
| CVE-2026-123284 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Datalore | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 improper authorisation on workspace moves allowed view-only collaborators to modify shared content | ||||
| CVE-2026-123286 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Datalore | 2026-11-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 improper authorisation allowed read the notebook owner's file storage session token | ||||
| CVE-2026-123287 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Datalore | 2026-11-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 private notebook files could be downloaded without authentication via published interactive reports | ||||
| CVE-2026-123289 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Datalore | 2026-11-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 improper authorisation allowed notebook viewers to modify files | ||||
| CVE-2026-123295 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Hub | 2026-11-06 | 8.1 High |
| In JetBrains Hub before 2026.2.52519 enforced two-factor authentication could be disabled via the profile update endpoint | ||||
| CVE-2026-103002 | 1 Gpustack | 1 Gpustack | 2026-11-06 | 8.8 High |
| GPUStack is an open-source GPU cluster manager for AI model serving and GPU instance provisioning. From 2.2.0 until 2.2.2, cluster_apiserver_proxy forwarded an authenticated non-administrator's requests to a selected Kubernetes cluster without a resource-level authorization check. The proxy used a reachable worker's Kubernetes ServiceAccount credentials, so the caller could read sensitive resources, create or modify workloads, or delete resources according to that ServiceAccount's permissions. Exploitation required a Kubernetes-provider cluster with a reachable worker, and attacker-controlled workloads could result in code execution in the target cluster. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97311 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Admin REST API of Keycloak, an identity and access management solution. The endpoints used to retrieve groups associated with a specific role do not properly check for individual group visibility permissions. This allows a delegated administrator with basic search privileges to view detailed information about all groups assigned to a role, bypassing intended security restrictions that should limit their view to specific groups. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97177 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 6.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the user update mechanism of the Keycloak Admin REST API. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions are enabled, the system fails to check for specific password reset authorizations during a general user profile update. This allows a delegated administrator, who should be restricted from resetting passwords, to change a user's credentials and take over their account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96446 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 4.2 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Pushed Authorization Request PAR implementation of Keycloak. The issue occurs when the silent authentication path prompt=none is used, which allows the authorization process to skip certain steps if a user is already logged in. Due to this bypass, the security rule that ensures a pushed request URI is used only once is not enforced. An attacker could potentially reuse a request URI to obtain multiple authorization codes for a user who is already signed in, violating security standards like FAPI-2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94217 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-11-06 | 3.5 Low |
| A flaw was found in the User-Managed Access (UMA) implementation of Keycloak. The issue occurs in the authorization token endpoint when processing permission tickets. If two different users own resources with the same name, the system incorrectly merges the permissions from both resources when one user requests an authorization token. This allows an attacker to gain access scopes on a victim's resource that were never intended to be shared. | ||||